OWL-Time is an OWL-2 DL ontology of temporal concepts, for describing the temporal properties of resources in the world or described in Web pages. The ontology provides a vocabulary for expressing facts about topological (ordering) relations among instants and intervals, together with information about durations, and about temporal position including date-time information. Time positions and durations may be expressed using either the conventional (Gregorian) calendar and clock, or using another temporal reference system such as unix-time, geologic time, or different calendars.

The namespace for OWL-Time terms is http://www.w3.org/2006/time#

The suggested prefix for the OWL-Time namespace is time:

The OWL-Time ontology is available here.

An ontology of individuals for the Gregorian calendar (months) is available here.

General Information

For OGC - This is a Public Draft of a document prepared by the Spatio-temporal Data on the Web Working Group (SDW) — a joint W3C-OGC project (see charter). The document is prepared following W3C conventions. Recipients of this document are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation.

New classes and properties are introduced in this revision of OWL-Time. The new elements primarily relate to relaxing the limitation that time position uses only the Gregorian Calendar, and are placed in a ogical hierarchy in relation to the original elements. While there is less implementation evidence for these than the elements from the 2006 version, the new elements are essential to satisfying key requirements in the revision.

However, a small number of other new elements merit additional explanation:

  1. :hasXSDDuration allows use of the compact xsd:duration element to describe the extent of a temporal entity. This complements existing predicates used with XSD datatypes, and was an inexplicable omission from the original ontology.
  2. :MonthOfYear (class) and :monthOfYear complement :DayOfWeek and :dayOfWeek to support vernacular names for months as well as days.
  3. :hasTime is a completely generic predicate for associating a temporal entity with anything. A number of generic predicates suitable for use directly in applications were requested, but in general were deemed undesirable in an ontology dealing with the description of time elements rather than their use. This one only was included for users unwilling or unable to define their own semantics.

Principles and vocabulary overview

Vocabulary specification

In this vocabulary specification, Manchester syntax [[owl2-manchester-syntax]] is used where the value of a field is not a simple term denoted by a URI or cURI.

RDF representations of OWL-Time are available at the vocabulary namespace URI - see Notation and namespaces.

Security and Privacy

OWL-Time supports the representation of temporal entities and relations within applications that require these concepts. Implementations that produce, maintain, publish or consume temporal information using OWL-Time must take steps to ensure security and privacy considerations are addressed at the application level.


Implementation report

OWL-Time has been put into use in a large number of applications. Some of these are summarized here.

Changes from previous versions

This version of OWL-Time was developed in the Spatial Data on the Web Working Group (a joint activity involving W3C and the Open Geospatial Consortium). The Ontology is derived from the one described in the 2006 Draft [[owl-time-20060927]] though the document has been completely re-written.

2021 update

2017 version

The principal technical changes are as follows:

Wide review

Results of wide review of OWL-Time is summarized here.

Response to Requirements identified in working group analysis

A number of requirements relating to Time were identified in the Spatial Data on the Web Use Cases & Requirements [[sdw-ucr]]. This section provides brief descriptions of how these requirements have been resolved.

Acknowledgements

The editors would like to thank the members of the W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web Working Group for their contributions during the development of this document.