Tech Radar POC ยท 2026-04-19 ยท Live Run
Paperclip Agentic Orchestration POC
Org charts, heartbeats, and budget controls for monday.com AI agents
Author
Radar
For
Keren Koshman
Signal
๐ŸŸข Ship it
Verdict
Integrate
Stars
55,600+
Background
What is Paperclip?
Use Case
The monday.com Fit
Hypothesis

"When you have 10+ AI agents running in parallel โ€” coding, researching, reviewing โ€” Paperclip is the management layer that keeps them coordinated, budgeted, and auditable."

Methodology
What We Actually Ran
Architecture โ€” Live POC
How the Loop Actually Works
Paperclip โ†’ Fires scheduled heartbeat on Radar agent (cron or on_demand)
โ†’ Process adapter runs openclaw-heartbeat.sh with env: PAPERCLIP_AGENT_ID, PAPERCLIP_API_URL
โ†’ Script calls openclaw agent --session-id main --message "[Paperclip Heartbeat] ..."
โ†’ OpenClaw wakes the main session, processes the wake event
โ†’ Agent replies: HEARTBEAT_OK
โ†’ Script exits 0 โ†’ Paperclip marks run succeeded
Live confirmed

Run ID 0c0569b2 โ€” Status: succeeded ยท ExitCode: 0 ยท stdout: "HEARTBEAT_OK"

Results โ€” Engineering Notes
Blockers Hit โ†’ All Resolved
Known gap

The openclaw_gateway adapter needs openclaw to accept a paperclip field in agent params. Filed as a watch item โ€” likely a minor schema update in a future OpenClaw release.

Evaluation
Paperclip vs. Current Alternatives
CapabilityPaperclipAsana/Linear + OpenClawRaw scripts
Agent org chart + hierarchyโœ… NativeโŒ ManualโŒ
Per-agent monthly budgetโœ… Hard stopโŒโŒ
Heartbeat schedulingโœ… Built-inโš ๏ธ Custom cronsโš ๏ธ DIY
Goal ancestry on tasksโœ… Nativeโš ๏ธ ManualโŒ
Immutable audit logโœ… Per runโš ๏ธ PartialโŒ
OpenClaw integrationโœ… First-classโš ๏ธ Webhooksโš ๏ธ Manual
Self-hosted, no account neededโœ…โŒ SaaSโœ…
Setup effortโš ๏ธ Medium (Docker + onboard)โš ๏ธ Mediumโœ… Low
Verdict
๐ŸŸข
Ship it. Integrate.
End-to-end heartbeat loop confirmed live. The "org chart for AI agents" framing is unique and fills a real gap. Lowest-effort integration of any agent orchestration tool evaluated this quarter.
What works

Install in 1 command ยท Self-hosted ยท OpenClaw native ยท Heartbeat loop confirmed ยท Budget controls ยท Org chart + ticketing ยท Audit log

Watch items

openclaw_gateway adapter schema gap (use process adapter for now) ยท Embedded PG needs non-root or Docker ยท LLM provider must be configured separately

Recommendation
Three Concrete Next Steps
01
Internal Demo
Show the Paperclip UI to the AI Innovation team. Spin up a live instance with the monday.com use case: CEO agent decomposes a product goal, engineers (Claude Code) implement, Radar (OpenClaw) researches. 30-min live demo, high impact.
โ†’ Effort: Low (instance already running)
02
Wire Bedrock LLM
The live POC used a process adapter bridge (no LLM). For real autonomous agent work, configure Paperclip's LLM provider (Bedrock/Anthropic) so the CEO agent can decompose goals and delegate tasks without manual intervention.
โ†’ Effort: Low (paperclipai configure --section llm)
03
Submit openclaw_gateway Fix
The schema mismatch (paperclip field in agent params) between paperclipai 2026.416.0 and openclaw protocol is a 1-line schema fix. Worth filing upstream or patching locally to enable native WS adapter instead of the CLI bridge.
โ†’ Effort: Low โ€” open issue or PR to openclaw repo
Next Steps
What Happens Now
Deck + code

github.com/monday-ai-club/paperclip-monday-poc ยท Rendered deck: raw.githack.com/monday-ai-club/paperclip-monday-poc/main/deck/index.html